Compliance Newshub
State News

This topic consolidates legislative summaries of new and revised state laws pertaining to licensing, originating, and servicing mortgage loans. 

News Search

From
To
Search

April 23, 2018

Arizona Amends Provisions Regarding County Recorders and Recording Fees

Bankers Advisory--Robert Harrison

Through Senate Bill 1043, the state of Arizona amended its provisions relating to county recorders and the recording fee per instrument. These amendments establish flat fees, per instrument, for recording papers required or authorized to be recorded by law; previously mandatory standard fees have been eliminated. The amended provisions are effective on July 1, 2019.

For recording papers, the flat fee will be $30 per instrument unless otherwise specified by the provisions (Arizona Revised Statutes §11-475(A)(1)). For recording papers at the request of the United States, Arizona, or specified Arizona political subdivisions the fee per instrument will be $15 (A.R.S. §11-475(A)(2)). Included in these flat fees are: special recording surcharge (A.R.S.§11-475.01(D)) and fees for the recording of deeds or contracts relating to the sale or transfer or property (A.R.S.§11-1132(B)). Furthermore, the new provisions require $4 of each fee collected by the county recorder be forwarded to the State Treasurer for deposit in the state General Fund (A.R.S. §27-208).

The following fees have been eliminated:

  • $15 for each deed that transfers, conveys or affects property interests
  • $25 for each deed of trust or mortgage
  • $10 for each release of a deed of trust or mortgage
  • $5 for recording an affidavit of annual work or claim maintenance fee
  • $1 fee for delivering an instrument by mail
  • fees related to indexing
  • fees for the first assignment, release, or partial assignment or release of any instrument

The full text of Arizona Senate Bill 1043 can be found here: https://apps.azleg.gov/BillStatus/GetDocumentPdf/461677

View Source

April 23, 2018

Colorado Amends Provisions Regarding Foreclosure Sales

The bill modifies and clarifies certain aspects of the foreclosure process on property encumbered by a deed of trust as follows:

  • Eliminates the authority of the attorney for a holder of an evidence of debt (holder) to specify the newspaper used to publish foreclosure notices;
  • Allows an amended combined notice to be omitted in a specified circumstances when the notice is provided by the sheriff or public trustee conducting the foreclosure (officer);
  • Modifies the amount of the deposit required for the fees and costs of the public trustee;
  • Omits a statement notifying borrowers of their ability to file a complaint if they believe a lender or servicer has violated certain requirements from the portions of a combined notice that must be published;
  • Makes changes to the bid form used by holders;
  • Clarifies the amount to be paid to the officer if the holder bids an amount that exceeds the amount due to the holder;
  • Prorates the amount of insurance premiums that may be claimed as costs;
  • Further specifies and modifies the procedures for restarting a foreclosure proceeding when a property is subject to a federal bankruptcy case or if a sale has been enjoined or set aside by a court;
  • Specifies the interest and other amounts that may be charged by the holder of a certificate of purchase when property is redeemed; and
  • Clarifies the procedure for junior subsequent lienors to redeem a property.

These provisions are effective on August 8, 2018.

View Source

Are You Up to Date?

Search our Compliance Calendar for current regulatory changes & updates.

Search Now

April 21, 2018

Oklahoma Publishes Notice Regarding Changes in Dollar Amounts

Bankers Advisory--Zachary Pearlstein

The Oklahoma Department of Consumer Credit has published its annual changes in dollar amounts for 2018. The revised dollar amounts are effective on July 1, 2018, unless otherwise noted in the chart.

In the state of Oklahoma, various dollar amounts set forth in the Uniform Consumer Credit Code change effective July 1 of each “qualifying year.” A qualifying year is any year in which the percentage of change (calculated according to the nearest whole percentage point) between the Index at the end of the preceding year and the Reference Base Index is ten percent (10%) or more. The calculations for dollar amount changes use figures from the Consumer Price Index Indicators, Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), issued each December by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

In a year when statutory dollar amounts are going to change in July, the Department must mail a chart with the designated statute sections and the corresponding dollar amounts to all licensed supervised lenders and persons who have made a timely written request for notice of dollar amount changes. These charts must be mailed no later than April 30th of each year.

The Department must mail the dollar amount changes chart to the Secretary of State as well, no later than April 30 of each year. The charts must also be published in the Oklahoma Administrative Code in an appendix to the Department’s rules.

The annual changes in dollar amounts for 2018 may be viewed on the https://www.ok.gov/okdocc/docu...

View Source

April 21, 2018

New York - Business Conduct of Mortgage Loan Servicers

View Source

April 20, 2018

Tennessee notaries will soon be able perform online notarizations nationwide

Housingwire--Ben Lane

Notaries in the state of Tennessee will soon be allowed to perform online notarizations for signers nationwide after the state’s legislature overwhelmingly passed online notarization legislation.

The bill authorized Tennessee notaries to perform online notarizations passed in the Tennessee Senate by a 30-0 margin, and in the Tennessee House of Representatives by a 94-0 margin.

The bill now moves to the desk of Gov. Bill Haslam to be signed into law.

Once the bill is signed, Tennessee notaries will join their counterparts in Indiana, Virginia, Texas, and Nevada in being able to perform online notarizations nationwide.

Those states allow their notaries to perform online, remote notarizations, which enable borrowers to sign their mortgage documents from anywhere, via secure video conferencing.

Tennessee becomes the second state to approve online notarization this year. Earlier in the year, Indiana passed its own online notarization bill.

The moves come on the heels of the National Association of Secretaries of State, a group that includes the secretaries of state for all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and the U.S. territories, adopting nationwide standards for online notarization.

In most states, secretaries of state are the commissioning authority for notaries, thereby giving them the authority to act as a notary.

According to the NASS, the electronic notarization standards can be used as a structure that policymakers and regulators use when developing and implementing remote notarization laws, regulations and guidance.

As with Indiana, Notarize, a digital platform that allows for legal, online document notarization, helped move the bill across the line.

“We’re thrilled Tennessee has voted to allow its notaries to perform notarizations online,” Notarize CEO Pat Kinsel said in a statement.

“We’ve served thousands of transactions for people in Tennessee to date and are excited to welcome Tennessee notaries to the Notarize platform as the law goes into effect,” Kinsel continued. “The best experience occurs when local notaries can serve local transactions and we’re thrilled to give Tennessee notaries to tools to meet their customers online.”

View Source

April 20, 2018

NYDFS announces investigation into rent-to-own as predatory lending

Buckley Sandler, LLP--InfoBytes Blog

On April 16, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) announced an investigation into whether rent-to-own and land installment home purchase agreements constitute unlicensed, predatory mortgage lending in New York. NYDFS acknowledged the ongoing investigation while releasing a consumer alert to New Yorkers about rent-to-own and land installment contract pitfalls. The alert notifies consumers that the agreements may violate certain New York laws and regulations governing fair lending, mortgage protection, interest rates, habitability, and property condition. NYDFS encourages consumers to consider a traditional leasing option and be aware of the state of disrepair the property may be in before signing the agreement.

View Source
Learn Why Clients Love ACES

Learn Why Clients Love ACES

"ACES has made my life so much easier from a QC perspective. It's life-changing"

- Kelly Cooper Spencer, QC & Business Intelligence Data Manager at Thrive Mortgage

Hear Why

April 19, 2018

Arizona Strengthens and Expands Data Breach Notification Law

Ballard Sparh, LLP--Roshni Patel

Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed HB 2154 into law on April 11, 2018, amending and strengthening the state’s data breach notification law. Notably, the amended law significantly expands the definition of “personal information” to include a number of new data elements, including online account credentials, certain health information, and biometric data used to authenticate an individual when the individual accesses an online account.  The amended law also requires that notice be provided within 45 days after a determination that a “security system breach” has occurred and adds an obligation to notify the Arizona Attorney General and nationwide consumer reporting agencies if the security system breach involves more than 1,000 individuals.

On April 25, 2018, from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. MT, Ballard Spahr attorneys will hold a webinar—Arizona Strengthens and Expands Data Breach Notification Law.  The webinar registration form is available here.

Click here for the full alert.

View Source

April 18, 2018

Wisconsin Foreclosure Bidding and Real Estate Transfers and Payoffs

Bankers Advisory--Zachary Pearlstein

The state of Wisconsin has recently passed Assembly Bill 607, relating to nonprobate transfers of real estate, the transfer by affidavit procedure for small estates, and payoff amounts in mortgage payoff statements. These updates are effective immediately.

The new bill first creates more flexibility for the transferring of real property upon death. While previously a designated beneficiary could only be named in a “transfer of death” deed, the new bill allows designated beneficiaries to be named in any document.  The only requirement is that all regulations and fees regarding the substitute document must be met and paid for, in order to ensure legality.

Second, the bill modifies Wisconsin’s transfer by affidavit procedure, so that it may be used when the gross value of the decedent’s estate is less than $50,000. When this procedure is used for real property, the decedent’s heirs must be notified.  Once the affidavit is recorded with the county’s register of deeds, the transfer of real property is complete.  The bill notes that purchasers and lenders who acquire improperly transferred property will be held harmless if acting in good faith.

Lastly, under prior law, creditors must provide payoff statements; however they are unable to state that a payoff amount is subject to change before the payoff date. The new bill creates more flexibility for creditors, by allowing them to qualify the payment amount, state that the payoff amount cannot be determined, or state that the payoff amount is subject to change under certain conditions.

Wisconsin Enacts Provisions Regarding Eligible Bidders at Foreclosure Sales

The state of Wisconsin has recently enacted provisions relating to eligible bidders at foreclosure sales, effective October 1, 2018.

The state of Wisconsin has passed Assembly Bill 691 in response to a longstanding problem with nuisance landlords that routinely purchase property at foreclosure auctions, but habitually fail to pay delinquent property taxes and court fines for building code violations.

Under current mortgage foreclosure law in the state, the only requirement of a winning bidder at a foreclosure sale is for the bidder to have cash for the purchase. Neither the court nor the sheriff conducting the sale do any screening of a bidder’s credentials or track record.  This allows nuisance landlords with deplorable track records to continue to buy properties and damage communities.

Under the new bill, there are two requirements placed on successful bidders at foreclosure auctions. First, the successful bidder must submit an affidavit to the court affirming that the bidder does not own property in the state that is more than 120 days tax delinquent.  And second, the affidavit must also affirm that the successful bidder does not have an outstanding judgement regarding noncompliance with state or local building codes.  These affirmation must also be true for an entity that the bidder owns, manages, or controls, or for any entity that owns manages, or controls the bidder.

If a court confirms the affidavit to be false, the court can refuse to confirm the sale, can order the bidder’s deposit forfeited, and can order a new sale. If the court finds that the bidder knowingly made a false affirmation, the bidder may be fined up to $1,000 and barred from bidding for up to a year.

View Source

April 15, 2018

Iowa Amends Power of Attorney Act

Bankers Advisory--Elizabeth Dailey

Iowa has made amendments to its Power of Attorney Act regarding an agent’s termination or suspension of authority. These provisions are effective as of July 1, 2018.

The current section of the Act provides that an agent’s authority as power of attorney can be terminated under various circumstances, including when the principal revokes authority and when the agent dies, becomes incapacitated, or resigns. Under the amendment to this section, an agent’s powers can now be terminated if the agent is named as the abuser in an abuse report regarding the principal’s financial resources, or if the agent is convicted of dependent adult abuse related to the principal’s financial resources.

The Act has also been amended to allow any person who becomes aware of pending criminal charges of dependent adult abuse against a principal to petition the court to construe a power of attorney or to review an agent’s conduct.

Finally, the amended Act provides that the court, upon receiving such a petition, may suspend the agent’s power of attorney and may appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the principal. Under this bill, the guardian ad litem must be a practicing attorney.

For the full text of House File 2402, please refer to https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/LGI/87/HF2402.pdf

View Source

April 14, 2018

Washington Recent Regulatory Updates

Bankers Advisory--Ryan Peters

Washington Enacts Law Relating to Services and Processes Available When Residential Real Property is Abandoned or in Foreclosure

Washington has enacted House Bill 2057, an “Act relating to the services and processes available when residential real property is abandoned or in foreclosure” (the “Act”). The Act is effective as of June 7, 2018.

As noted in the Substitute Bill Digest, the Act “modifies provisions relating to nonjudicial foreclosures, required beneficiary remittances, notice of preforeclosure for residential reverse mortgages, and a process for when residential real property is determined by a local government to be abandoned, in mid-foreclosure, and a nuisance.”

For the full text of Washington House Bill 2057, please refer to:

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2017-18/Pdf/Bills/House%20Passed%20Legislature/2057-S.PL.pdf

 

Washington Establishes Student Loan Bill of Rights

Washington has passed an “Act Relating to establishing a student loan bill of rights” (the “Act”). The Act requires certain “clear and conspicuous” disclosures be made by licensees for consumer loans that are a refinance of a federal student education loan. The Act is effective as of June 7, 2018.

Section 14 of the Act states in part:

[…] (4) In addition for all consumer loans made by the licensee that are secured by a lien on real property, the licensee must comply with RCW 19.144.020. (5) In addition for all consumer loans made by a licensee that are a refinance of a federal student education loan, the licensee must provide to the borrower a clear and conspicuous disclosure that some repayment and forgiveness options available under federal student education loan programs, including without limitation income driven repayment plans, economic hardship deferments, or public service loan forgiveness, will no longer be available to the borrower if he or she chooses to refinance federal student education loans with one or more consumer loans. (6) The director’s obligations or duties under chapter . . ., Laws of 2018 (this act) are subject to section 21 of this act.

Section 21 of the Act states that, “The department of financial institutions and the director or director’s designees do not have any enforcement, examination, or reporting obligations or duties under this act until January 1, 2019, or until the final adoption of rules pursuant to this act, whichever is sooner.”

For the full text of Washington Senate Bill 6029, please refer to:

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2017-18/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/6029-S2.SL.pdf

View Source
Learn Why Clients Love ACES

Learn Why Clients Love ACES

"ACES has shined a light on our productivity and empowered us to hold our teams accountable."

- Emilee Rada, Director of Lending Operations at Georgia's Own Credit Union

Hear Why

April 13, 2018

New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) launches online portal for anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering regulation compliance certification

Buckley Sandler, LLP--InfoBytes Blog

On April 9, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) announced the launch of a new online portal that regulated entities may use to securely file certifications required under New York’s risk-based anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering regulation. This regulation took effect January 1, 2017, and regulated entities must file their first certification of compliance by April 16 and annually thereafter. The regulation requires regulated entities to maintain programs to monitor and filter transactions for potential Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering violations, and ban transactions with sanctioned entities. The announcement states that filing through the online portal is preferred over alternative filing mechanisms.

View Source

April 13, 2018

Oregon amends debt collection statute to expand coverage to debt buyers

Buckley Sandler, LLP--InfoBytes Blog

On April 3, the Oregon governor signed SB 1553, which amends Oregon’s debt collection laws to provide that a debt buyer (or a debt collector acting on a debt buyer’s behalf) engages in unlawful collection practice if it collects or attempts to collect a debt without providing a debtor, within 30 days of their request, documents which establish the nature and amount of debt.

View Source

April 12, 2018

Kentucky House Bill 369 Amends Provisions Regarding Contracts

Summary

Amend KRS 360.010 to specify when parties are bound to interest rate in contract and the interest rate parties are entitled to receive after default; create a new section of KRS Chapter 371 to specify that an obligation to pay or satisfy a debt is not extinguished by any action taken by a creditor for the purposes of the creditor's own financial, tax, or accounting records or affairs.

Effective July 12, 2018

View Source

April 05, 2018

Utah Modifies Provisions Regarding Record Requirements and Investigations under RMPLA

Bankers Advisory -- Rhona Kyeyune

The state of Utah modified its provisions under its Residential Mortgage Practices and Licensing Act (RMPLA) relating to licensure requirements, record requirements and investigations. These provisions are effective on May 8, 2018.

Section 2 of the amendment provides that “the division of real estate may not license an entity and a licensed entity may not conduct the business of residential mortgage loans unless the entity conducts the entity’s business of residential mortgage loans from a location within the United States.”

Section 3 provides for record requirements and states that “a licensee, or a person required to be licensed shall maintain the licensee’s or the person’s possession a record required for that licensee by a rule made by the division.”

Section 4 states that “a failure to respond to a request by the division in an investigation within 10 days after the day on which the request is served is considered as separate violation of this chapter.”

Section 7 amends provisions relating to registration requirements and qualifications under the Appraisal Management Company Registration and Regulation Act. It states that “an appraisal management company is required to register if in a calendar year, the company oversees an appraiser panel of twenty-five or more certified or licensed appraisers including at least one appraiser certified or licensed in the state and at least one appraiser certified or licensed in a state other than Utah, a territory, or the District of Columbia.”

Section 10 provides for fees charged by the division of real estate for registration and services and states that “the division shall collect the annual registry fee from each appraisal management company and each federally regulated appraisal Management Company, and transfer the fees collected to the Appraisal Subcommittee on a monthly basis.”

Section 11 provides for the appraisal management company adherence to professional standards and states that the “appraisal management company shall have a system in place to ensure that it only selects for a real estate appraisal activity an appraiser who is independent of the transaction and has the requisite education, expertise, and experience necessary to competently complete the real estate appraisal activity for the particular market and property type.”

“The appraisal management company shall also conduct its services in accordance with the requirements of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 764 1639e (a)-(i), and the regulations thereunder.”

Section 12 provides that the “division of real estate authority may examine any book or record of an appraisal management company and require the appraisal management company to submit any report, information, or document to the division.”

“Upon the Appraisal Subcommittee’s request, the division shall transmit a report to the Appraisal Subcommittee regarding the division’s supervisory activities involving appraisal management companies or other third-party providers of appraisals and appraisal management services, including any investigation the division initiates or disciplinary action the division takes.”

Section 13 provides that “a license under this chapter is not required for services rendered by an attorney admitted to practice law in Utah in performing the attorney’s duties as an attorney.”

The Real Estate Appraiser and Licensing and Certification Act provisions regarding the duties of the real estate appraiser licensing and certification board and the division of real estate’s denial of licensure, certification, or registration and investigations are also modified.

View Source

Stay Informed, Subscribe to the Compliance Newshub